Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
guidelines_for_guest_lecturers [2018/11/01 16:31] – [Presentation] Christophe Dessimozguidelines_for_guest_lecturers [2018/11/01 16:34] (current) – [What to expect after the presentation] Christophe Dessimoz
Line 22: Line 22:
 ===== What to expect after the presentation ===== ===== What to expect after the presentation =====
  
-The students have 2 weeks to write their review. During this time, James or I will meet up with them at least twice with them: once after 3 or 4 days to discuss their outline, and once after 10 days to give feedback on their manuscript, prior to submission. That being said, the student might also contact you directly for technical questions, clarifications, etc.+The students have 2 weeks to write their review. During this time, I will be at their disposal to answer questions or provide informal feedback on their outline or draft. That being said, the student might also contact you directly for technical questions, clarifications, etc.
  
 Once the review has been submitted, you __and__ two anonymous students from the course will have a week to provide comments on the manuscript. Once the review has been submitted, you __and__ two anonymous students from the course will have a week to provide comments on the manuscript.
  
 The writer will then have a week to revise and correct their manuscript, after which you will get a copy of the "final" version. Depending on its quality and your interest/availability, we will discuss the possibility of putting in more work to publish the review. The writer will then have a week to revise and correct their manuscript, after which you will get a copy of the "final" version. Depending on its quality and your interest/availability, we will discuss the possibility of putting in more work to publish the review.
  • Last modified: 2018/11/01 16:34