no way to compare when less than two revisions

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.


—instructions_for_referees [2018/10/23 11:26] (current) – created - external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Instructions for Referees ====== 
  
 +Consider the following questions when writing your report:
 +
 +  * Assess significance
 +    * Is the topic addressed important/interesting? (Does the review say why?)
 +    * How original is the review? 
(compared with existing reviews of field?) 
 +    * Are the results reported significant?
 +  * Verify accuracy
 +    * Are all claims backed by evidence?
 +    * Are the evidences relevant/reliable/sufficient?
 +    * Are methods/results appropriate and
 well-described?
 +    * Is important relevant work omitted?
 +    * Does the review suffer from any bias?
 +  * Improve clarity
 +    * Is the review well organized?
 +    * Do title/abstract accurately reflect content?
 +    * Right level of detail?
 +    * Language issues or typos?
 +
 +The typical report consists of one page of plain text. To help the author and editor, all claims should be backed by evidence.
 +
 +//A note on the format of your peer-review:// the best format to submit your review is just plain text pasted in the relevant fields. Alternatively, you can submit a PDF or DOC document, but be aware that your name might be included in the metadata of that document, thereby compromising your anonymity.  
  • Last modified: 2018/10/23 11:26